For example, companies that are part of a multinational group, whose profitability margin is outside the range obtained for independent companies operating in the same industry, are likely to be subject to a tax inspection on the transfer pricing side. Moreover, in this situation, there are also companies that register operating losses in consecutive periods.Alina Ghiță Manager, Tax
Taxpayers' guide for 2023: preparing for a tax audit is about identifying and monitoring risks early on
Taxpayers' guide for 2023
- The enterprises that may be subject to a tax inspection are those with profitability below the average profitability of companies with the same NACE code or companies with operating losses over a sustained period of time.
- The risk sub-criteria, which were created from the four main criteria listed in the Tax Procedure Code, was recently published by NAFA.
- Large taxpayers must submit the transfer pricing file within 10 days of receiving a request from the tax authorities.
- As a result of taxpayer appeals, between 45% and 60% of the amounts included in the tax assessment decisions are subsequently rejected or cancelled.
In the context of the pressing need to increase budget revenues to offset exceptional expenses generated by the current economic situation, as well as to identify any potential situations of profit shifting from one jurisdiction to another, tax administrations have launched a significant number of tax audits worldwide. Thus, in recent years, tax inspections carried out in Romania, which have targeted direct taxes and, in particular, transfer pricing, have also become increasingly numerous, and 2022 has brought an increase in this regard, but also a shorter timeframe for their conduct.
The National Agency for Fiscal Administration (NAFA) published a press release earlier this year, in which they announced that 555 tax inspection and unannounced control actions are being carried out on large taxpayers, out of which 128 are being carried out on taxpayers with recurrent losses. Moreover, according to another NAFA communication in June, anti-fraud inspectors estimated tax implications of about RON 77 million (representing VAT, taxes, social and health contributions, and other taxes), estimated in 292 control reports.
The selection of the taxpayers to be subjected to the tax audit is made according to the conducted risk analysis
In the case of a company, the decision to start a tax inspection is based on a risk analysis, which starts from the information provided to NAFA (e.g. financial statements, declarations, etc.) by the company. The risk analysis can be defined as an assessment carried out by the tax administration, which cannot be contested by the taxpayer, to identify situations of tax non-compliance.
According to the activity report of the General Directorate for the Administration of Large Taxpayers, a specific risk management system has been created, which should help make tax inspections more efficient, by classifying taxpayers into tax risk classes. Thus, we have the following categories:
- High tax risk - companies will be subject to tax inspection;
- Medium tax risk - companies will be subject to unannounced inspections;
- Low tax risk - companies will be subject to notifications and document reviews.
Moreover, in view of the most recent order published by NAFA, the risk sub-criteria have been approved, which were developed from the four main criteria established in the Tax Procedure Code, namely:
- the criteria on tax registration: e.g. sub-criteria on non-registration for VAT purposes or as a payer of corporate tax/specific tax/microenterprise income tax/excise duties/income tax and social contributions;
- the criteria on the filing of tax returns: the sub-criteria on the non-filing, erroneous filing or late filing of tax returns or the sub-criterion on the risks associated with partners/shareholders/directors or other persons from the perspective of filing tax returns;
- the criteria on the level of declaration: e.g. sub-criteria on the incorrect declaration of tax rate and amount, on inconsistency or incoherence of data in tax returns with data in other forms required by law, on reduced profitability.
- the criteria on the fulfilment of payment obligations towards the general consolidated budget and other creditors: e.g. sub-criteria on late payment or non-payment of tax obligations, sub-criterion on insolvency.
The implementation of the risk analysis has led to a significant increase in additional tax liabilities imposed as a result of the investigations carried out, and according to the activity report, in 2021, the percentage of tax inspection reports completed on taxpayers with high tax risk was 33% of the total reports completed, while the percentage of additional liabilities imposed as a result of these investigations was 61%.
The tax risks identified in the analysis can also be validated by means of unannounced inspection, which is carried out without prior notice to the taxpayer. The unannounced inspection may consist of checking documents, checking certain transactions (as part of cross-inspections), or assessing a specific tax risk.
In respect of the above issues, as well as the verification of the risk category by each taxpayer, companies need to prepare documents and identify and monitor the risks that may arise to avoid an adjustment as a result of a tax inspection that would target transfer pricing.Gabriela Roman Assistant Manager, Tax
The transfer pricing file must be made available to the tax authority within a maximum of 10 days from the date of the request in the case of large taxpayers
Taxpayers who carry out transactions with related companies with a total annual value greater than or equal to any of the materiality thresholds detailed below are required to prepare and submit a transfer pricing file at the request of tax inspectors.
The transfer pricing file must be prepared by any taxpayer, regardless if a tax inspection is announced or not
Firstly, the annual preparation of the transfer pricing report is an advantage for any category of taxpayer, as the risks can be identified before an inspection begins and possible deficiencies can be identified and corrections made to mitigate the negative impact of a tax inspection.
Another important aspect can be to review and substantiate the transfer pricing policy at the local level, as well as to present a clear picture for the group on the documentation obligations in Romania, i.e. the level of risk.
We would also like to reiterate that the deadline given by the authorities for the preparation and submission of the transfer pricing file may be insufficient in view of the number and complexity of the intra-group transactions to be analysed, especially in the context of time pressure and other requests from the tax authorities in the context of the tax inspection. Thus, regardless of whether a tax inspection is expected or not, we recommend having the transfer pricing file ready.Liviu Gheorghiu Director, Tax
As a result of taxpayer appeals, between 45% and 60% of the amounts included in tax assessment decisions are subsequently rejected or cancelled
Taxpayers should consider appealing against tax assessment decisions issued by NAFA following tax audits when they disagree with the conclusions included in tax inspection reports, especially given the significant number of cases where the outcome of the appeal was positive for the taxpayer.
From the analysis of the statistics published by NAFA, in 2021, a total of 604 tax inspection actions were carried out and additional amounts of RON 1,000,250,544 were established. Following the completion of 263 tax inspection reports, 166 tax decisions were issued, of which 43 were appealed. Based on the data published by NAFA, it can be concluded that a significant percentage (between 45% - 60%) of the amounts included in the tax assessment decisions following tax inspections are rejected or subsequently cancelled as a result of appeals filed by taxpayers.
In Romania, the mutual agreement procedure has not been applied in a significant number of cases so far, but it can be an effective alternative to court actions
Considering the cross-border operations of multinational groups, and the fact that in recent years they have even managed concurrent tax audits in several jurisdictions, transfer pricing adjustments at the level of the entity in Romania and/or its contractual partners in other jurisdictions may lead to double taxation situations, one possibility for their resolution being the mutual agreement procedure. In Romania, this procedure has not been applied in a significant number of cases so far, but it can be an effective alternative to litigation.
The effects of the war in Ukraine and rising inflation and energy prices are just some of the challenges for the coming year from a transfer pricing perspective
While some industries or taxpayers, in particular, are still impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, FY2022 brings additional topics to consider from a tax perspective. These economic conditions have generated several discussions or even disputes from a transfer pricing analysis perspective for 2020 and 2021, either within multinational groups or between them and tax authorities in different jurisdictions.
Thus, the effects of the war in Ukraine, rising inflation, rising energy prices coupled with end-customer caps or exemptions, rising interest rates, the prospect of a general fall in consumption, and rising unemployment are all elements that add to the problems that multinational groups were already facing from 2020 onwards, i.e. delays or disruptions in the supply chain, rising logistics costs, rising fixed costs, etc.
Therefore, more attention should be paid to the analysis of transfer prices in 2022 within multinational groups from the perspective of establishing the functional profile of the parties to the transaction, the allocation of exceptional expenses and losses, the financing policy, documentation of cross-border business restructuring or transfer of staff or the impossibility to allocate staff to certain locations.
Emilia Popa, Head of Marketing and Communication, Mazars Romania
firstname.lastname@example.org / +40 741 111 042
Mădălina Lazăr, PR & Corporate Communication Executive, Mazars Romania
email@example.com / +40 763 385 622
Mazars is an internationally integrated partnership, specialising in audit, accountancy, advisory, tax, and legal services*. Operating in over 90 countries and territories around the world, we draw on the expertise of more than 44,000 professionals – 28,000+ in Mazars’ integrated partnership and 16,000+ via the Mazars North America Alliance – to assist clients of all sizes at every stage in their development.
*where permitted under applicable country laws.
www.mazars.com | Mazars on LinkedIn
About Mazars in Romania
In Romania, Mazars has 27 years of experience in audit, tax, financial advisory, outsourcing, and consulting. Our strength lies in the people we work with – the local team has 300 professionals.